California ProLife Council

Life. It's Worth the Effort.

  • Home
  • About
    • About CPLC
    • Policy Statements
    • How We’re Structured
    • What is the Right to Life?
    • The Story of the CPLC Bear Flag Symbol
    • Concilio Pro-Vida de California
      • Peticiones
    • Contact Us
    • Login
  • Abortion Sanctuary Legislation
    • AB 2223 Infanticide Legislation
    • Proposition 1 Reproductive Freedom Constitutional Amendment
    • Abortion Bills 2021-2022
  • Volunteer
    • Life Ambassadors
    • Church Outreach
    • Internships
    • Affiliates of CPLC
    • Volunteer Sign-Up
  • Donate
  • 2024 Voter Guide
  • Elections
    • Help your County Find out who is who
    • 2022 Candidate Questionnaires
    • Email to Send with Candidate Questionnaires
    • Past Years Endorsements
      • Elections 2020
      • Voter Guides 2018
      • California ProLife PAC Endorsements 2018
      • Judge Voter Guide 2018
      • 2016 State & Federal Endorsements
      • 2015 Sen Asm Legislator Pro-life Score Summary
      • 2014 General Election Voter Guides
      • CPLC PAC Ballot Endorsements
        • Yes on 46?
      • 2013 Legislative Scorecard
      • Find Your Legislator
      • Register to Vote
  • Projects
    • The Zip Code Project
    • Signs of Life in Hollywood
    • ProLife Youth Competitions
      • ProLife Youth Oratory Contest
      • ProLife Youth Essay Contest
      • ProLife Youth Video Contest
    • Pro Life Attorneys Network (PLAN)
    • The “Forgetting Someone” Project
  • Petitions
    • Against Government Financed Abortion
    • Peticiones
  • Film Festival
  • Resources
    • Abortion Information
    • Public Records Act Request Responses
    • Public Records Act Request Responses
    • ProLife Conference Sponsorships
    • Euthanasia & Assisted Suicide Information
      • Death as a Salesman
    • Pregnancy Help
      • Crisis Pregnancy Centers
    • ProLife Speakers
    • Internship with CPLC
    • ProLife Remote Internship
    • Sanctity of Human Life Sunday
  • News
    • Action Alert
    • Email Archive
  • Blog
  • Life Matters
  • Death as a Salesman
  • 10,000 Californians Praying
  • The Light of Day Project
  • Do More Than Walk!
  • The Evil Twins
  • Help The PAC
You are here: Home / Archives for Dylan Raines

Frisco Hospice Center Directed Nurses to Overdose Patients

March 31, 2016 by Dylan Raines

5045102307_31e20a5603_b

Unbelievable. Nurses at a Medical Facility in North Texas were regularly directed to, “Make this patient go bye-bye” by the owner. Click Here for local coverage on the full story.

 

We cannot stand for this. Join the fight for life today by becoming a member.

Filed Under: blog

Assisted Suicide Laws Defeated in Germany!

November 15, 2015 by Dylan Raines

A victory abroad is a victory for us. More and more we are faced with cultural battles that are reflected as legal ones, and whenever a legal battle is won- even in another country- we have reason to celebrate.

Dr. Josef Schuster, president of the German Council of Jew in Germany led the charge in “a long, serious and sometimes emotional debate” that ended with a bill being passed that actually toughens the country’s stance on the issue, punishing doctors who still encourage the practice. [More on the Bill Here]

Victories like this can encourage us to continue fighting unjust practices such as assisted suicide here at home too. Find out how you can get involved by filling out our contact form below!

Filed Under: blog

Where does your Representative stand on Life issues?

October 26, 2015 by Dylan Raines

We’ve compiled a list of California’s Representatives, Senators and Assembly Legislators and their voting records on Life Issues. Use the legend below to find out how your representative responds to the following three questions:

  1. Does the office seeker support legal protection for unborn children?
  2. Does the office seeker support requiring parental consent before an abortion can be performed on a minor child?
  3. Does the office seeker oppose efforts promoting a state policy of euthanasia such as physician assisted suicide?
[Y=Yes] [N=No] [?=Unclear Position] [NR=No Response]

The Column on the far right is how often they vote in with Planned Parenthood. 0% indicates a perfect pro-life voting record, while 100% indicates a perfect Planned Parenthood voting record.

CAcongressCAsenateCAassembly

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Action Alert!

April 10, 2015 by Dylan Raines

ca capitolDangerous Bill Being Snuck Through!

California’s SB 1095 would Result in Harm and Death for the Unborn

California’s SB 1095 would result in expansion of genetic screening, so that CA would be required to screen for “any (…) disease detectable in blood samples” – not only after birth, but in the words of the bill, as part of “prenatal care” – prior to the child having the opportunity to be born. The bill proposes that the “diseases” which would be funded for screening and ultimate exclusion from the gene pool would be decided upon by a Federal RUSP – a panel of persons that nobody in the State of California can influence or control.

Legislators sneakily brought the bill off of suspense, and passed it out of Assembly Appropriations Committee on August 11, 2016.  (The bill has passed Senate and is now on its Second Reading in the Assembly.)

This bill proposes an unlimited expenditure of funds, that would grow over time. I quote from the bill, which proposes an “expenditure of funds from the Genetic Disease Testing Fund for the expansion of the Genetic Disease Branch Screening Information System to include (…) any (…) disease that is detectable in blood samples.”

Read that carefully: “any (…) disease that is detectable in blood samples.” The effects of this screening and what will ultimately be a California effort at ‘negative eugenics’ will grow – causing untold harm to billions.

This bill would cause billions to be screened out of the gene pool either as a result of aggressive genetic counseling, recommendations for genetic modification, or abortion.

Please schedule online advocacy action to stop this bill.  It appears that the bill is being rushed to passage out of the Assembly; it may be that the best way to stop the bill would be to write the Governor to ask that SB 1095 be vetoed when it arrives at his desk.

The Governor’s mailing address is:
Governor Jerry Brown
c/o State Capitol, Suite 1173
Sacramento, CA 95814
Alternatively, he can be contacted online at:
https://govnews.gov.ca.gov/ gov39mail/mail.php

Special thanks to Colin Gallagher

——–

These other bills are currently circulating through the Legislature. It is important that your voice be heard regarding these issues that impact our families and our culture.

Make sure to use the link provided to find and contact your representatives and tell them oppose or support these bills! 

Find your State Rep here


AB 2531 – offers payments to young women for the sale of their eggs. These are then used in IVF, cloning and human experimentation. By its very nature, IVF requires the destruction of fertilized embryos. Please follow progress and contact YOUR legislator


 

AB 1671   This bill would prohibit David Daleiden type reportage on Planned Parenthood, offering it special protections.


AB 775 –Pregnancy Care Center Discrimination and “Gag” Rule (Chiu) – 

This Bill is currently under court challenge.

This bill mandates a statement all Pregnancy Care Centers would have to tell mothers seeking care that includes how to get an abortion but not alternatives like adoption. It also exempts abortion clinics from giving the same mothers the same information. 

 California’s Pregnancy Resource Centers offer ‘competition’ to the abortion industry. We need to make sure that they are able to offer the support and answers that women deserve!

You can assist our amicus brief legal fund here.

 


SB 277 – Mandated Childhood Vaccines Intrude on Parental Rights (Pan) –

This bill strives to eliminate the personal belief exemption option from the school immunization law forcing parents to vaccinate their children from all diseases deemed necessary by the Department of Public Health (DPH). Some immunizations use tissue from aborted babies.

Based on false ‘science’, SB 277 makes sweeping claims to government authority over all California’s children. It will not allow substitute vaccines, and the moral, ethical, and scientific questions surrounding certain immunizations are not to be respected.

SB 277 has been signed by the Governor

We are filing an amicus brief in the lawsuit filed Aug.12 that challenges its constitutionality. You can assist us here.



SB 128 – Physician Assisted Suicide (Wolk) – 

This measure passed as  AB X2 -15 through an Extraordinary Session

This bill will legalize assisted suicide. It will remove the current legal protection that prevents third-party involvement in killing the medically vulnerable. Wherever enacted, such laws have thrown open the gates for much broader killing. This bill is being litigated by Life Legal Defense in Riverside County, and a hearing is scheduled in September.

 

 



 

 Stand with us. Stand with Life. 

Filed Under: News

Victory for the Republican Party Platform…for now

March 12, 2015 by Dylan Raines

The pro-life plank in the Republican platform is safe for now. Conservative leaders, including three of California ProLife Council’s vice presidents whom sit on the platform committee, travelled from all over to come to Los Angeles for the CA Republican Party Convention this past weekend. Some in attendance were there in an attempt to remove traditional planks from the party platform, those including the pro-life plank. They were not successful in doing this at the convention. But the fight is not over yet. In the spring the GOP will hold a spring convention in Burlingame where the platform will be up for a vote amongst all the delegates.

full story below:

http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/2011/09/california-gop-committee-blocks-pus.html

Filed Under: blog

Important Update-CA Republican Party Platform

March 12, 2015 by Dylan Raines

This summer, California ProLife sent key officers to the Republican Platform Drafting Committee. They opposed it and reported back on the pending proposal to re-craft and ‘streamline’ the Platform.

We at California ProLife immediately alerted pro-lifers through our e-mail network. Many of you have responded, and for that we are very grateful. Many of you have been in direct communication with members. California ProLife Council has as well, and in addition sent each member a copy of Ronald Reagan’s book, Abortion and the Conscience of the Nation.

Now an update regarding the current status: The full committee will meet at the end of this week-end’s Convention. This may be a positive thing… for the time being. Pro-life Assemblyman Dan Logue, who chairs the committee, believes the votes are there to maintain the current platform. As the vote will take place AFTER the full convention the pro-abortion forces will not be able to appeal the decision and then attempt to bring a resolution to the floor.

But what this means is that there will very likely be a full floor-vote at the next State Republican Convention in Burlingame. So the question remains: Will the state Republican party follow the example of Arnold Schwarzenegger or Ronald Reagan? We will see then.

Thank YOU for standing strong for Life!

Filed Under: blog

Investors Business Daily Nails California’s Stem Cell Fraud

March 12, 2015 by Dylan Raines

The backers of a $3 billion bond passed by California voters for stem cell research has failed. They kept no promises and have given money to support those on the 29 member board. Investors Business Daily nails the Stem Cell fraud in an editorial. The editorial hope voters will return to science and fiscal sanity. Something they forgot when they passed Pro. 71 in the first place.

Filed Under: blog

Sleep With One Eye Open, Obama Installs “Health Care” Pick

March 12, 2015 by Dylan Raines

Yesterday, President Obama decided to circumvent any confirmations hearings in the U.S. Senate by installing Donald Berwick as the head of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)

Confirmation hearings would have publicly exposed Berwick’s well-documented support for rationing health care.

Just last year in a June 2009 interview with the journal Biotechnology Healthcare, Berwick said, “The decision is not whether or not we will ration care – the decision is whether we will ration with our eyes open.”

The year before in the May/June 2008 issue of Health Affairs, he called for “rational collective action overriding some individual self-interest” in order to “reduce per capita costs.” Yep, those pesky patients think that their doctor’s visit is about them!

Rationing health care is not a new position for him. In a 1994 Journal of the American Medical Association article, he argued that, “Most metropolitan areas in the United States should reduce the number of centers engaging in cardiac surgery, high-risk obstetrics, neonatal intensive care, organ transplantation, tertiary cancer care, high-level trauma care, and high-technology imaging.”

Of course less treatment options means less treatment which means you live less. Dead people cost less. This is the change people voted for?

Filed Under: blog

SIX WAYS TO DEFEAT PRO-LIFE CANDIDATES

March 12, 2015 by Dylan Raines

By Carol Long Tobias, NRL PAC Director

In every major election since 1980, pro-life candidates have had the advantage when it comes to voters and the abortion issue. Consistently, of those voters who select their candidate based on his or her abortion position, more will vote for the pro-life candidate than the pro-abortion candidate. These votes will come from men and women, Republicans and Democrats – – all segments of society.

In a close race, this “pro-life increment” – – more single-issue pro-life voters than single-issue pro-abortion voters – – can make the difference between winning and losing. Unfortunately, some pro-abortion candidates win because part of the pro-life community doesn’t help elect pro-life candidates, it helps defeat them. When pro-abortion candidates win, unborn babies lose.

So what could you do that would help defeat pro-life candidates?

1) Fall in love with your candidate.

We encourage pro-lifers to get involved in campaigns. Their active participation and volunteer activities can help a pro-life candidate build a strong campaign. It also puts the pro-lifer in contact with the candidate so that if he/she wins, the candidate can put a face to the pro-life community and a relationship can be built and strengthened.

However, too often pro-lifers get so wrapped up in their candidate that if he/she loses to another pro-life candidate (especially in a primary), the pro-life grassroots person becomes like the child who lost a game – – he takes his marbles and goes home. He doesn’t support the pro-life candidate who won and won’t volunteer in the campaign or work to get others to vote for that candidate. Pro-life candidates need the active support of all pro-lifers and, all too often, without that full support, a pro-abortion candidate wins.

2) Believe that your candidate is the only real pro-life candidate in the race and bash other pro-life candidates.

In a primary where there are several pro-life candidates, pro-life individuals will select the candidate they think is best. Then, unfortunately, all too often they will help to attack other pro-life candidates as not being “pro-life enough.” If another candidate has a 20-year pro-life voting record, they pick out the one or two votes that he didn’t vote right on and attack him as not being really pro-life. By doing this, the pro-lifer demoralizes other pro-lifers and weakens enthusiasm for the pro-life candidate who does win the primary. The pro-abortion candidate will, of course, use this.

Because some pro-lifers have attacked the successful pro-life candidate, the pro-abortion candidate will use that in pro-life circles to hold down support for his opponent. Ironically, at the same time, the pro-abortion candidate is going to other voters, attacking the pro-life candidate as a “radical pro-life extremist.”

3) Support a really nice candidate who is pro-life but has no chance of winning.

We’re talking about millions of unborn children whose lives are at stake. The viability of a candidate must be considered when we decide who to vote for. There are some wonderful pro-lifers, some even active in our chapters, who want to run for office. They should be given the chance to do so, but if it is apparent they can’t win, if they are running to make a statement or to get some publicity for the pro-life movement (or themselves), they need to be encouraged to step aside for a candidate who may not be as eloquent but who can actually win and take action to protect unborn children.

4) Expect the candidate to sound like a Right to Life chapter chairman.

People who are not directly involved in the pro-life movement are not going to be as articulate or well-versed on all the pro-life issues. They may not know about the abortifacient properties of RU 486 or understand the ins and outs of the Mexico City Policy.

Unless there has been some prior discussion, some candidates may not realize that there are certain “code words” that are interpreted differently by the pro-life community. Just because the wrong word comes out of his/her mouth doesn’t necessarily make the candidate a phony.

Sometimes a truly pro-life candidate can be tripped up by the media, confused, ill-informed, misquoted, or quoted out of context. Give him a chance to explain why he said what he did.

Many candidates are against abortion because they have a religious background that tells them abortion is wrong, or they have a natural instinct that wants to protect the babies. They will do what’s right when they’re elected, but that doesn’t mean they will be comfortable or eloquent talking about the killing of unborn babies.

Some of our strongest pro-life elected officials whose actions have helped to save hundreds of thousands of unborn babies are not articulate on pro-life issues. Remember, words are nice, action is better.

5) Expect the candidate to make abortion the top issue in the campaign.

A Voter Research and Survey exit poll in 1992 found that 13% of the voters said abortion was a top issue in deciding who to vote for. In 1996, a Wirthlin Worldwide poll found that 12% of the voters said abortion was a top issue for them. That can and does make a difference in the outcome of an election, but it also means that 87% and 88% of the voters had other issues that were more important to them.

In order to win, a candidate has to focus on several issues that will appeal to a broad variety of voters. In some races, making abortion an issue will help the candidate, but in some parts of the country, the pro-life candidate must be careful in what he says and how he says it. In most areas, the institutional news media is a powerful tool for the pro-abortion candidate. To always expect the candidate to make abortion the top issue in the campaign can be a sure way to lose an election.

6) Vote for a third-party candidate who has no chance of winning.

When a general election is between a pro-life candidate and a pro-abortion candidate, representing established parties, there will be times when a third-party candidate will get into the race, claiming to be the “real” pro-lifer. He will attack the pro-life candidate and get other pro-lifers to jump on board.

This is a sure strategy to elect the pro-abortion candidate. Pro-lifers who support the third-party candidate, to the detriment of the pro-life candidate who could win, may feel like they have not compromised their principles – – but if they succeed in helping to elect a candidate who will act consistently to allow the killing of unborn babies to continue, they have compromised away something far more important – – children’s lives.

Filed Under: blog

Rick Santorum Joins California ProLife and NRLC in Backing Fiorina!

March 12, 2015 by Dylan Raines

Pennsylvania’s former U.S. Senator, Rick Santorum, a long-time pro-life stalwart has joined CPLC, Sarah Palin, NRLC and a host of other pro-life groups and individuals in backing Carly Fiorina in her fight against Tom Campbell and Barbara Boxer.

http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=YjA1YmJhMDRmYjdlNmIzNGQ1YTJmOTgzYjIwNzI0ZjI=

Filed Under: blog

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • Next Page »

Donate to CPLC!

Donate Cryptocurrency

Pre-order the new book by Brian Johnston.

MyPillow

Recent Posts

  • (Ira Byock, MD, advocate of terminal sedation, advances his cause under the aegis of the Archdiocese of Los Angeles on Feb 7.)
  • Abortion regulations in California? None. Though unregulated, it’s government funded
  • The Bloomberg Effect
  • What does your Church actually teach about Voting?
  • Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Responsibility to vote and vote for morally upright values

Sign Up for more Pro Life News

Sign up for personalized pro-life updates in your area!

There was an error fetching lists. Please refresh your lists and try again.
Privacy by SafeUnsubscribe

California ProLife Council
500 Capitol Mall, Suite 2350
PO Box 935
Sacramento, CA 95812

Toll-Free: 1.800.924.2490

Donate Your Car

Donate your Car

Donate to CPLC!

Donate Cryptocurrency

MyPillow

Copyright © 2025 · Outreach Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in